Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Redistributive programs support free trade regimes by compensating workers adversely affected by import competition. However, the effective implementation of these programs depends on bureaucrats who run these programs. We argue that bureaucratic delays in delivering redistributive benefits might make losers of import competition aggrieved and support protectionism. We test this argument using local petition data from the US Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) program. We find that bureaucratic delays in determining TAA petitions politically increase both voters' and politicians' preferences for protectionism. We recover the idiosyncratic traits of individual TAA bureaucrats’ and find that bureaucrat quality is negatively associated to TAA delays after controlling for local exposure to trade shocks and local political characteristics. We also show that where assigned bureaucrats are lower quality, voters are more likely to exhibit attitudes against cosmopolitanism, through their effect on TAA delays. Importantly, we show that this effect is moderated by strong labor unions as they help workers make more successful TAA petitions.