Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
It’s often said that “All politics is identity politics”. Political scientists and pundits often invoke group membership as an explanation for political behavior. Often, however, these group attachments are undefined or poorly conceptualized. Consequently, they overlook the fact that group memberships are consequential for politics to different degrees, at different times, for different people. When are group memberships consequential for politics? Building on research in identity theory, and social identity theory in particular, I develop a theory of when individuals with different types of psychological group attachments are likely to become involved in politics and how those attachments translate into opinion and action, and support and opposition to candidates, parties, and policies.