Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Affective polarisation is on the rise in many democracies. At the same time, populist radical right parties (PRRPs) are often seen as a driver of affective polarisation. Yet, we know little about how these parties link Christian narratives to ingroup-outgroup dynamics. This is remarkable as PRRPs frame their political discourse in religious terms by referring to countries’ Christian-shaped heritage despite having, at least in the European context, a predominantly non-religious electorate. This study addresses these strategic references by examining the Christianity-related rhetoric in the political communication of PRRPs in comparison to the way Christian Democratic parties refer to Christianity. I argue that PRRPs emphasise intergroup dynamics by using religious references in an exclusionary way. To do so, I consider potential differences in the context in which these connotations are used by PRRPs vis-à-vis Christian Democratic parties.
Using data from ParlSpeech V2, I focus on parliamentary speeches given by politicians from PRRPs and Christian Democratic parties in seven European countries. Methodologically, I conduct automated text analysis relying on a transformer-based approach. I apply a pre-trained and then fine-tuned model to identify religious connotations and their co-occurrence with types of inclusive-exclusive rhetoric. Insights from my analysis contribute to a cross-national and between-party understanding of the rhetoric around Christianity, shedding light on PRRPs’ linkage of religious references to group dynamics