Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Standing up for democracy requires speaking up. Both in scholarly work and everyday speech, virtuous citizens are portrayed as those willing to engage in practices of contestation to resist governmental abuse. In this paper, I argue that political virtue is more costly and riskier to some people than others, and, in particular, it is more onerous for those already marginalized. I examine three ways in which the expectation of standing up for democracy can have worrisome implications by: 1) entrenching socio-economic disparities and reifying power structures, 2) raising questions about private domination, and 3) unwittingly reproducing stereotypes about who can embody the ideal of the virtuous citizen. In so doing, I do not mean to argue against the many merits of contestation but to think critically about how we narrate the expectation that others protest and resist with us.