Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Political parties have increasingly included gender equality in their political priorities and governments across Europe have paid increasing attention to gender equality issues across a variety of policy domains. While tangible progress has been made toward the realization of equality, opposition to equality+ initiatives has also dramatically expanded.
This increasingly polarized attention has resulted in contrasted policy responses. First, the tempo of policy adoption tends to vary greatly both across countries and across policy domains. Second, the extent to which policies are gendered and de-gendered also greatly varies. Classic gender issues such as reproductive rights have been reactivated across Europe through a growing number of attacks. At the same time, attacks also increasingly focus on new issues such as transgender+ rights.
This paper proposes to analyse the dynamics in attention toward gender+ equality issues across space, time, and institutional venues. It investigates the appearance of the pro/anti equality issues on the institutional agendas, the actors involved and the strategies/counterstrategies, the combination with other issues, and their travelling across venues, space, and time and examines the determinants for successful strategies and counter-strategies to gender+ equality across political institutions.
Drawing on the systematic analysis of policy attention (party manifestos, cabinet speeches, parliamentary questions) and action (laws, constitutional court cases) across Western Europe (Austria, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Switzerland, and the UK) and Central Eastern Europe (Hungary and Poland), we contend a large part of the answer lies in the political attention and competition process and how policy action is negotiated, adjusted, or even radically shifted from words to deeds.