Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Previous research has found that women’s political careers are more vulnerable than men’s. Not just do women face more barriers in getting included in politics, but their careers are found to be more easily disrupted by factors such as scandals, family matters, harassment, and toxic work relationships. Though scholars have demonstrated how women are more likely to be punished from wrongdoing than men, few have attempted to analyze the effect political parties have on the likelihood of being forgiven. Using a mix of qualitative interview data and survey results from the Norwegian citizen panel, we analyze how party affiliation and gender matters for politicians’ opportunities for being selected to minister posts after violating ethical guidelines. Empirically, we focus on Norway, a country characterized by comparatively high trust in politicians and historically few major political scandals, but where several distinguished Norwegian female politicians—and a few men—have been found guilty in breaching different guidelines for how elected leaders ought to handle their public and private affairs in recent years. The list of misconduct in office includes stock trading husbands, appointments of friends to board positions, theft, and fingering with information about residency and travels. We ask why and when voters and parties are ready to forgive individual politicians’ mistakes. As such, our research sheds light on parties’ role in securing the careers of their politicians, and simultaneously how party considerations intersect with politicians’ gender, implicating that gender can shape yet another aspect of the trajectory of contemporary political careers.