Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In this paper, we illustrate how crises provide opportunities for women to exhibit their leadership capacity. We argue that these opportunities, however, are conditional on creating gender role congruency. To demonstrate our argument, we employ a qualitative comparative case study between former German Chancellor Merkel and former New Zealand Prime Minister Ardern across three distinctly gendered domains: COVID-19 (feminine domain), terrorist attacks (masculine domain), and natural disasters (gender neutral domain). We conduct a qualitative content analysis of each leader’s public remarks and parliamentary speeches as well as news editorials commenting on their crisis management to determine whether and when Merkel and Ardern were able to create gender role congruency across their leadership style and rhetoric in each respective crisis issue. Next, we ask whether this gender role (in)congruency impacted their approval ratings. We find that when crises produce gender role congruency for women leaders, their leadership is evaluated positively, enhancing their hold on political power. In contrast, when crises created gender role incongruity for Merkel and Ardern, approval ratings suffered, exacerbating backlash, and reinforcing the masculinization of executive office.