Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Scholars have recently claimed that regime personalization increases state repression. While military regimes and some revolutionary ones have been incredibly repressive, this claim concerns overall repression, not particular repressive tactics. We use structural equations to capture the recursive relationship between three regime types (revolutionary, military, and strongman) and three repressive tactics (oppression, coercion, and state terrorism). We argue for this relationship to be, in turn, modeled as realizations of 3 underlying, time-varying institutional dimensions of autocracies -- namely, party institutionalization, military involvement, and personalism. Our analysis reveals that military and especially strongman regimes are associated with state terrorism but not revolutionary ones and that revolutionary regimes, but not the other two, are significantly associated with coercion.