Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In this paper, I examine one understudied mechanism through which criminal organizations like street gangs and drug cartels have undermined the integrity and legitimacy of democratic institutions in Central America: their deliberate efforts to influence elections outcomes, or what I call “criminal electioneering.” I develop a conceptual and theoretical framework to help explain (1) when criminal groups choose to engage in criminal electioneering; (2) why, when they do, their tactics vary along two key dimensions (the degree to which they target voters vs politicians and the extent to which they overt violence); and (3) how different criminal electioneering tactics shape voter attitudes toward democracy and toward hardline anti-crime policies. I argue that two key variables drive criminal electioneering outcomes at the subnational level: the degree of criminal competition and politicians’ access to local party resources. I test my hypotheses through a survey of voters in Guatemala carried out in the aftermath of the country’s 2023 general election. I discuss the implications of my findings for emerging debates about the relationship between criminal violence and democratic legitimacy and survival in Central America and beyond.