Attitudes toward Wind Projects and Their Electoral Implications in Texas

• In Event: Energy, Politics, and the Public

Abstract

Wind power is increasingly cost-competitive, but there are growing concerns that partisan backlash will limit the rapid adoption of this low-carbon energy source. When evaluating wind projects, do voters consider the local costs and benefits of turbine construction? Or do their opinions reflect elite polarization on the issue? To answer these questions, we turn to the case of Texas: A state at the forefront of both wind project viability and elite polarization over the issue of wind power development. Surveying everyday Texans reveals public opinion about wind power is driven primarily by considerations of local costs and benefits and is on average positive. These opinions affect vote choice: Turning to electoral outcomes from 2012-202, state legislative incumbents received a greater vote share when turbines were constructed in their precinct or district since the previous election. Despite increasing partisan animosity on the topic of renewable energy, voters evaluate local costs and benefits and reward incumbents who deliver on wind projects.

Authors

• Talbot M Andrews, Cornell University

• Oksan Bayulgen, University of Connecticut

• Lyle A. Scruggs