Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Universal suffrage is the rule in almost all countries that hold elections today. Existing evidence, however, amply demonstrates that legal equality does not necessarily translate into equal effective representation. This paper investigates the impact of socioeconomic factors on citizens’ abilities to elect their preferred candidate. Client-politics explanations suggest that top-down efforts enhance coordination and increase the effectiveness of low-income voters in electing their chosen candidates. Alternatively, collective action theories highlight education and income as contributors to coordination and vote effectiveness. We test these competing hypotheses in Brazil, where mandatory voting drives high participation rates across socioeconomic groups. Using a unique dataset that combines election results at the polling station level and census-tract data, we show that even in the context of close to full participation, underprivileged groups are less likely to translate their political participation into political representation.