Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The workplace is an important arena for political conversations with a high potential for peer pressure since interactions are frequent and we care about our social standing at the workplace. Knowledge about these processes is however scarce. We argue that peer effects at the workplace are particularly important to understand since workplaces are becoming more sorted according to human capital, which implies that workplace peer effects can increase social inequalities in turnout. To explore this issue we use population-wide individual-level administrative data from Sweden that covers several general elections and includes firm identifiers so that turnout of colleagues can be measured. The data allows us to construct an instrumental variable for workplace turnout that is based on the turnout of peers of peers in previous elections. We show that this instrument passes relevance tests and argue that the exclusion restriction is likely to hold. We estimate peer effects under different definitions of peer groups at the workplace and leverage the richness of the data to estimate placebo peer effects. Our preliminary estimates suggest that workplace peer effects are politically important.