Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
How do women gain political legitimacy in settings where they have historically lacked influence? In particular, how do they navigate bureaucracies, the main institution that shapes their ability to implement policies, which has predominantly been represented by men? In this chapter, I link how women's primary pathway into politics globally—gender quotas—creates conditions that limit their institutional and political authority after they are elected to office. I examine this question in India, where approximately 95% of women at the village level are elected through gender quotas. By entering through this pathway, women are perceived as being elected through "easy to win'' seats with less competition and with lesser experience than non-quota candidates. Subsequently, women may face a penalty when they interact with the bureaucracy. This chapter theorizes how women's entry into politics through quotas shapes bureaucrats' perceptions of their competence, ability to mobilize citizens for policies, and their networks within politics and bureaucracy. It then expands on why bureaucratic perceptions of these three factors shape their incentives to assist men politicians over women politicians, who are significantly more likely to be non-quota candidates, in resource-constrained settings.