Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The academic debate on whether there exists a panacea or a failsafe strategy for resolving civil wars is ongoing and contentious. This study critically assesses whether the thematic consistency in peace agreement texts correlates with uniform outcomes in civil conflicts, specifically in terms of fostering lasting peace or precipitating conflict re-emergence. An extensive analysis of over 2000 peace agreement texts from the PA-X database is undertaken, employing quantitative methods to measure their textual congruence. The research identifies key content characteristics that are consistently associated with successful conflict resolution. Findings reveal that agreements with detailed, inclusive frameworks, particularly those that emphasize political inclusivity, effective disarmament procedures, and comprehensive post-conflict reconstruction strategies, show a higher propensity for replication and are more often linked to sustainable peace. The study also notes that the applicability of specific agreement components, such as power-sharing arrangements, is heavily influenced by the unique socio-political and cultural contexts of the conflicts. These results highlight the necessity for contextually adaptable, well-structured peace agreement templates as instrumental in the pursuit of lasting peace in post-civil war societies. It also substantially contributes to the discourse on peace and conflict studies, offering nuanced guidelines for structuring future peace agreements.