Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The possible diversion of nuclear materials from energy programs into weapons construction is a well-covered subject in the study of nuclear security. Rather than centering the technical problems of dual-use, this paper tracks how the idea of nuclear dualism has changed throughout the nuclear age and how both state actors and civil society groups frame the military and civilian potentials of nuclear technology. Early framings centered around “dual pathways” of peaceful and destructive use to shift away from the specter of nuclear annihilation. In the 1970s, anti-nuclear activists challenged this dualism and successfully tied together energy and weaponry in public discourse. More recently, pro-nuclear activists contest this connection. Through historical analysis and interviews with contemporary pro- and anti-nuclear activists, this paper tracks how framings of nuclear dual-use inform public views on nuclear technology and argues that dual-use should be treated not only as a technical problem but as a matter of framing.