Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
How does border fortification shape the impacted militant groups' propaganda and governance activities? We argue that when border fortifications interdict their foreign logistics, militants compensate by cultivating greater local support. Specifically, militants engage in influence campaigns, generating propaganda aimed at mobilizing civilian cooperation and preserving the support of core cadres. Empirically, we use a two-pronged research strategy that balances identification and generalizability: First, a difference-in-differences design using declassified microdata on border fortification and insurgent operations in Afghanistan offers causal evidence that border fortification drives militants to more civilian-targeted propaganda outreach efforts; Secondly, analyses using original data on the propaganda outputs of 38 Islamist militant groups, along with natural language processing techniques, reveal that militant propaganda engages with more religious themes in the wake of border fortification. Overall, our results re-evaluate the effect of border control as a key counterinsurgent tactic and shed light on the nonviolent strategy used by cross-border militancy.