Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In the United States, same-sex couples’ parental rights are legally linked to their marital status. Prior to Obergefell v. Hodges, same-sex couples were not guaranteed the legal rights to their children that opposite-sex couples enjoyed. The link between marriage and parental rights meant that this disparity was especially significant in states where same-sex marriage was banned. This paper builds on existing evidence that same-sex couples see challenges to their parental rights as a threat rather than an inconvenience. I theorize that parents in same-sex relationships will migrate when states ban same-sex marriage with the caveat that these families’ ability to remove themselves from hostile legal environments is limited by economic conditions. I test this theory using panel data of American states from 1999–2020. The analysis reveals that when the unemployment rate increases in states with same-sex marriage bans same-sex couples and their children are less likely to migrate compared to families living in states without bans. Parents in same-sex relationships are also less likely to migrate compared to parents in opposite-sex relationships when unemployment increases in states with same-sex marriage bans. These results demonstrate that parents in same-sex relationships do migrate in response to hostile legal measures, but their ability to do so is limited by economic conditions.