Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Existing research recognizes the critical role of symbolic identities in the political domain as they have the power to affect social attitudes, political identities, voting patterns, party assessments, and more. Evidence suggests that social identity develops in early childhood and remains stable throughout individuals’ lifespan. However, a growing body of literature argues that political leaders may use rhetorical acts to entrepreneur identities, thus unifying their potential supporters around specific identities. This paper explores the relationship between politicians’ discourse on social media and the stability of symbolic identities among the public. We use unique data sets collected over four years, drawn from two main sources: (1) a computational content analysis of political discourse that measured and classified symbolic political identities; (2) a 14-wave panel that measured the respondents’ degree of identification with symbolic identities. We find that identities are dynamic and changing. Respondents who are exposed to politicians’ discourse on social media are significantly more inclined to change their identification over time. Moreover, we found correlations between identities mentioned by individuals and those mentioned by the political leaders they follow. These findings contribute in several ways to our understanding of both the (in)stability of symbolic identities and the ability of leaders’ political rhetoric to influence the electorate.