Search
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Mini-Conference
Browse By Division
Browse By Session or Event Type
Browse Sessions by Fields of Interest
Browse Papers by Fields of Interest
Search Tips
Conference
Location
About APSA
Personal Schedule
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In this research, we study intrametropolitan population movement at intermediate ranges of distance. Movement between and among larger cities and towns at greater distances, but still within states, is quite likely to sort residents into pockets of political homophily. These flows are not from a central city to surrounding destinations within the same metropolitan area, but instead reflect movement from one metro area to another. Prominent examples include movement from larger central cities to smaller, secondary, cities within the same state, or from those secondary cities back toward a major metro. Examples might include flows from Philadelphia to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, or the reverse; Pittsburgh to Erie, Pennsylvania; Raleigh to Charlotte, North Carolina; or Tampa to Jacksonville, Florida. Places gaining ground in the ongoing intermetropolitan contest for growth will be more affluent but not necessarily more Republican. Conversely, those losing population will be in economic decline but this does not always predict growing Democratic dominance.